Join2Grow.biz : The network for entrepreneurs - Entrepreneur network

Technology

Your website: the good, the bad and the ugly

They’ve come a long way, but websites still have far to go. It’s not enough these days to simply stick your company’s logo and a few blurbs on the internet. Design, targeting and added value all work to make - or break - a website.

The best of website design can approach modern art. The seamless blending of colour, text and shape can make the marriage of art and commerce wonderfully profitable. A good website can determine whether your electronic venture is a cash cow or huge waste of time and money. The past 10 years have witnessed an explosion of sites and a flowering of eye-catching conceptions. But the medium as we know still remains imperfect and sometimes downright annoying. Those are the conclusions from Forrester Research which has examined more than 1,000 sites over the past couple years.

Forrester analyst Bruce Temkin says, “In the early days, the biggest problems sites had was with value. They just weren't delivering value. Now that's improved, but over the last few years, the bigger problem has become navigation.” Sites have grander ambitions, they’re complex and they try earnestly to deliver much more value. But sometimes, it’s hard, almost impossible, to really find what you want, when you want it.

There are many ways to provide value to your clients. Having all the most important information just ONE click away is most important. Providing adequate information about your products or services is another. Many websites, especially web-based businesses, offer value by giving discounts to customers who venture onto the web.

The most obvious example is www.amazon.com with online stores throughout Europe, the United States and parts of Asia. They want to make your trip to the web worthwhile by offering reductions on books, electronics, games and a score of other products, ranging from 5 to 70%! Many travel sites, airlines, car hire agencies and a host of others reward you for going online. Even small hotel chains or individual proprietorships give you incentive to cut to the chase and book online. It saves them (and you) time and money. Certainly, many of these stores exist only on the web. This might not fit your enterprise. But the point is clear – think creatively of how you can offer more value online to today’s demanding consumers.

Good Bad or Ugly
Think creatively of how you can offer more value online to today’s demanding consumers

15 comments

next page >

Your comments and questions [15]

Kitty

The BEST book in the world re Web Design "DONT MAKE ME THINK" by Steve Krug. Get it, read it.

Keys point - forget 3 clicks - its the condifence (or not making them think - its bloody obvious) your visitor has in getting to the information they want by going down the path they are on. Nothing more fustrating than clicking eight times and info is not there. However if it was logical and obvious and info there i would not even know i clicked 8 times.


1/24/2008 
Koen (20 interest)

I completely agree with Michel that you shouldn't squeeze as much info on one page as possible. The main argument, in my point of vue, is information overload.

Page structuring itself is one of the most important parameters to get people to take a closer look at the page in the first place -- of course there are many other ergonomic and information architecture principles to keep in mind. So, if you start by discouraging visitors to inspect the page, you will certainly not have any conversion.

Second point is analytics. Again, I agree with Michel to split up content over different pages to keep track of user behaviour related to content. This is not possible when you throw all content on a single page.

I do not agree, however, that everything should be placed above the so-called "Fold". Because, by now people are long used to scrolling. The importance of the fold is still exaggerated.


11/21/2007 
Mr M (32 interest)

in the category e-commerce: dell.com, amazon.com, apple.com
in the category info: bbc.co.uk (looks ugly at first, but you'll find more than you came for)
in the category viral: jealouscomputers.com

And this is how I also try to make a point: whether a website is great depends on the bigger purpose it's serving...


8/1/2007 
Marcel (48 interest)

Hello fellow 'writers'.
What would be your top 5 best websites (covering all elements that make a website good, better, best)?


7/27/2007 
Mr M (32 interest)

I'm pleased to see that you have put conversion-drivers (content, navigation and creativity) before traffic-drivers as it is the first thing to worry about; traffic you can buy. What I miss is a bit of Kaizen, Japanese for 'continuous improvement'.

A website never is perfect, certainly not in the beginning, and you need to adjust to changing needs, behavior and circumstances in order to keep visitors arriving at the right page (i.e. confirmation of payment ;-)). Now to be able to adjust your website in the correct direction you need knowledge on how things are currently going and that's why web-statistics are very important. It is immense powerful when analyzed correctly.


7/25/2007 
Harvey (18 interest)

Gents,

Summarising all comments, when setting up a site it is important to keep track off, (1) content (the offering), (2) technique (mainly speed) and (3) creativity (look and feel; give it a modern touch).

Also a site would become more professional/ interesting/ entertaining when (partly) interactive. It's also necesary (1) to integrate the site on all the search tools (google, yahoo ...), (2) promote it (writing articles in the press) and (3) link it with other sites and blogs

Avoid pages to be too long and avoid having to click 20 times to get to the bottom (I think 7 clicks is deemed a nice max?)

And last but not least: Forrester points at the possibility of adding (added) value. In the case of Amazon in competition with bol.com as a direct competitor and bricks and mortar businesses possibility is becoming necessity.

Did I miss anything?


7/24/2007 
Michel (15 interest)

Well, making them click 20 times is perhaps a bit over the top, I agree. But I believe that you should not overload a page nor make them scroll down (below the fold). Finishing a conversion-chapter gives some kind of satisfaction, it encourages to go to the next one and the click is the sound that tells you you made process. It's comparable to a book, I think; you live up to the end of the chapter and then you're triggered to read on, step by step. It's the completion of several small tasks that adds to the satisfaction of fulfilling the full process.

Concerning the webstatistics, I think it is valuable to split up the conversion-pages as to clearly see on which page things go wrong and people bail. If you put all on one page, you do not get any info on where they got frustrated and it's impossible to improve conversion rates. But perhaps there's no such thing as an ideal website like there's no ideal car; it just depends on the circumstances what's ideal for that specific situation.


7/23/2007 
NDOA Joins 2 (52 interest)

@Harvey: In the end your website is a marketing tool and it should tell your clients something about yourself. If you start adding all kinds of non-core products you might make your client loose your image. So you do need to keep things directed at yourself, do what feels good to you, as you would do in real life. And off course that does mean taking a hard look at why you want something or not.

@Michel, getting people to click twenty times, would mean that you give them something on every page they go to, why not put as much as possible on one page? In that way you give them as fast as possible that what they are searching. It also keeps your datatracking in focus, because you do not need to track data on so many pages.

And you are right, websites should be morron-proof, so everything should work and follow a reasonably logical approach.


7/23/2007 
Harvey (18 interest)

It is accepted knowledge that when setting up a site there are 3 important issues to keep track off, (1) content (the offering), (2) technique (mainly speed) and (3) creativity (look and feel).

Forrester points at the possibility of adding (added) value. In the case of Amazon in competition with bol.com as a direct competitor and bricks and mortar businesses possibility is becoming necessity.


7/21/2007 
Michel (15 interest)

Yes NDOA, I have also heard of the 3-click rule before and I do believe that if visitors haven't found their trail (cf. Mr M) within that effort- or time-period, they bail. On the other hand, when you can give them the feeling they are advancing click by click, I assume you can make 'm click twenty times... As long as it's going somewhere!

Furthermore, treating them like 'morrons' is not an option, but I think that because of upcoming cyber-fatique visitors are less attentive when buying online vis-à-vis buying in a physical store. It's a feeling, I'm not sure. The result is that the online approach should be morron-proof, but not morron-ized!?


7/20/2007 
1   [2]  

Leave a comment or ask a question

Anonymous

Send message
ok

 

Leave a comment or ask a question

Anonymous

Send message